ArticleBiosensors2026
A Low-Power PLL-Less Wideband OOK Wireless Neural-Signal Transmitter for Miniaturized Neural Interfaces with In Vivo Validation in Freely Moving Mice.
Article in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-channel-count neural recording requires wireless links with high throughput, low power, and compact implementation, yet commercial protocols and phase-locked loop (PLL)-based transmitters often trade data rate against power and complexity. We present a low-power, PLL-less wideband on-off keying (OOK) neural-signal transmitter fabricated in a 180 nm CMOS process. The transmitter employs a free-running inductor-capacitor voltage-controlled oscillator (LC-VCO), a Gilbert mixer for OOK modulation and reverse isolation, and a current-reuse stacked power amplifier. It consumes 8 mA from a 3.3 V supply (26.4 mW), demonstrates modulation and receiver frame acquisition at a maximum raw input rate of 90 Mbps, corresponding to a 180 Mbps Manchester-coded line rate, and tunes from 3.266 to 3.445 GHz. End-to-end bit error rate (BER) was measured at raw rates of 15 and 31.2 Mbps, corresponding to encoded rates of 30 and 62.4 Mbps; the latter matches the in vivo data stream. The transmitter was integrated with a 128-channel recording chip and evaluated in freely moving adult C57 mice. Wireless hippocampal spike and local field potential (LFP) recordings, wired-system comparison, and event-locked LFP analysis support its feasibility for untethered neural recording.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.