ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Engineering Parameter Window for Filament Formation and Early-Stage Evolution in Embedded Printing of Gelatin/Alginate Hydrogels Within Carbomer Support Baths.
Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Embedded 3D printing of hydrophilic hydrogels in aqueous support baths often suffers from filament deformation, positional deviation, and diffusion before complete cross-linking, while practical parameter-selection guidelines for specific material systems remain limited. In this work, an integrated engineering evaluation method was developed to characterize filament formation and early-stage evolution during embedded printing of gelatin/sodium alginate inks in Carbomer support baths. Filament quality was assessed using cross-sectional geometry, contour irregularity, deposition position, and early-stage diffusion ratio. The effects of printing kinematics and material rheology are systematically examined to establish a practical process window for this hydrophilic ink-bath system. The results show that the speed ratio between substrate and ink is a primary factor controlling filament geometry and deposition position, and a ratio close to 1 yields the most balanced cross-sectional morphology without position shift from the printed nozzle. Ink with high viscosity maintains contour irregularity within a narrow range of 0.005-0.009 and suppresses early diffusion, whereas a support bath with high viscosity and ink with high viscosity combination further slows diffusional evolution by about 70%. Based on the identified process window, several three-dimensional hydrogel structures were fabricated successfully. The proposed workflow provides a practical route for process evaluation and parameter selection in hydrophilic embedded printing, especially for continuous filament and tubular structures, and offers engineering guidance for bio-soft material fabrication in applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.