ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Adhesive Bonding to Hydraulic Gel-Forming Calcium Silicate-Based Cements: Effects of Cement Type, Adhesive Strategy, and Restoration Timing.
Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Calcium silicate-based cements are hydraulic biomaterials that form a calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) gel during hydration, a process fundamental to their setting and progressive physicochemical development. Although these materials are widely used in vital pulp therapy, evidence regarding the effects of adhesive strategy and restoration timing on bonding performance, particularly for newer premixed formulations, remains limited. This study evaluated the effects of cement type, adhesive strategy, and restoration timing on the shear bond strength (SBS) of resin composite bonded to MTA Angelus and Well-Root PT. A total of 270 specimens were distributed across two cement types, three adhesive strategies, and three restoration intervals (45 min, 24 h, and 7 days). After thermocycling, SBS and failure modes were assessed. SBS data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA, whereas failure-mode distributions were evaluated using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests (α = 0.05). Cement type, adhesive strategy, restoration timing, and their interactions significantly influenced SBS (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.