ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Programmable Hydrogels for Surgical Interface Control: Function-Based Design, DNA-Based Molecular Modules, and Translational Evaluation.
Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical procedures create dynamic interfaces between tissues, fluids, gases, and applied materials. Failure to control these interfaces can cause leakage, postoperative adhesion, scar tethering, poor tissue integration, maladaptive host responses, or loss of mechanical support. Hydrogels are attractive surgical materials because their hydrated polymer networks can be engineered for wet-tissue conformity, adhesion, transport, degradation, mechanical compatibility, and local biological activity. However, many hydrogel systems are still evaluated by polymer chemistry, stimulus type, or isolated physicochemical properties rather than by the operative function required at a defined surgical boundary. This narrative review proposes a function-based framework for designing and evaluating programmable hydrogels in surgical-interface control. Four principal functions-sealing, separation, protection, and integration/reinforcement-are linked to dominant failure modes, design priorities, endpoints, and comparator requirements. Hemostatic and other biological activities are treated as primary clinical claims or adjunct programs when they support these interface functions. Responsiveness is distinguished from clinically meaningful programmability using five operational criteria: input relevance, encoded transition, baseline and off-target stability, interface-level output, and matched-control comparison. DNA-based hydrogels are discussed as molecular modules for recognition, assembly, crosslinking, degradation, actuation, and release, mainly within mechanically robust hybrid systems. This framework emphasizes time-resolved, function-specific evaluation under procedure-relevant conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.