Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42644937›Full record

ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Development of Periodontal Organoid-like Constructs Using Human Periodontal Ligament and Gingival Epithelial Cells: Comparison of Two Assembly Strategies.

Luiza de Oliveira Matos, Mariane Beatriz Sordi, Anahid Ahmadi Birjandi, Paul Thomas Sharpe, Ariadne Cristiane Cabral Cruz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luiza de Oliveira MatosCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4521-0007
Mariane Beatriz SordiCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7873-0765
Anahid Ahmadi BirjandiCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9010-633X
Paul Thomas SharpeCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.
Ariadne Cristiane Cabral CruzCentre for Dental Implants Research, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88040-900, SC, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7306-4708

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa Catarina 17/2026ITI International Team for Implantology 1717-2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Periodontal organoid research remains underdeveloped, largely due to the lack of standardized fabrication protocols and multicellular constructs capable of reproducing epithelial-mesenchymal interactions relevant to periodontal biology. In particular, it remains unclear whether different spatial assembly strategies influence construct stability, multicellular organization, or early molecular behavior in periodontal three-dimensional (3D) systems. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and compare two different methods for generating dual-lineage 3D periodontal organoid-like constructs using human periodontal ligament cells (hPDL) and human gingival epithelial cells (hGEP). These strategies were selected to compare two biologically and technically distinct spatial configurations: bilayer assembly to partially mimic epithelial-connective tissue compartmentalization, and surface seeding as a simplified fabrication approach with potential advantages for reproducibility and workflow standardization. Both cell types were cultured in different media conditions (CnT-57, DMEM, and a 1:1 CnT-57/DMEM mixture) to determine compatibility for co-culture applications. Cell viability was assessed on days 1, 3, and 7 using the MTS assay. Constructs were produced in hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels using two strategies: Group 1-sequential photopolymerization of hPDL and hGEP layers to generate a bilayer construct; and Group 2-encapsulation of hPDL followed by direct seeding of hGEP onto the construct surface. Viability within constructs was evaluated on days 3 and 7 using the Live/Dead assay. Morphology was monitored using stereomicroscopy on days 0, 1, 3, and 7. Exploratory RNA sequencing was performed on day 7 to characterize transcriptomic profiles. All tested culture media maintained cellular viabilities above 70%, with no statistically significant differences among conditions (

Indexed as

human gingival epithelial cellsperiodontal ligament cellsperiodontal organoidsregenerationthree-dimensional cell culture

Identifiers

PMID42644937
PMCPMC13512850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.