ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Anisotropic Hydrogel Fibers for Soft Robotics: From Structural Engineering to Multi-Responsive Actuation.
Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hydrogel fibers provide a one-dimensional platform for constructing soft robotic materials that combine tissue-like compliance, high water content, structural anisotropy, and stimulus responsiveness. Compared with bulk hydrogels, their reduced radial dimensions shorten mass-transport pathways, while programmable fiber architectures convert otherwise isotropic swelling or contraction into directional deformation. This review summarizes the recent progress in anisotropic hydrogel fibers for soft robotics, with emphasis on the relationships among fabrication strategies, fiber architectures, actuation mechanisms, and robotic functions. Representative architectures, including Janus, bilayer, core-sheath, hollow, helically twisted, gradient, axially patterned, woven, and printed systems, are discussed in terms of their strain-conversion mechanisms, structural advantages, limitations, and suitable applications. Major fabrication approaches and stimulus-responsive mechanisms are further compared with respect to structural programmability, response kinetics, mechanical output, cyclic stability, scalability, and device integration. Particular attention is given to architecture selection, long-term environmental stability, interference from secondary stimuli, and the transition from laboratory demonstrations to practical soft robotic systems. Finally, key design principles and future directions are outlined for developing faster, more durable, manufacturable, and autonomous hydrogel-fiber-based soft robots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.