Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42644851›Full record

ArticleAORN journal2026

Preventing Retained Surgical Items Through the Development of a Safer Telescopic Sponge-Counting System.

Lorie Hassel-Chuang, Mindy Stites, Lisa E Guthrie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AORN journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lorie Hassel-Chuang
Mindy Stites
Lisa E Guthrie

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A retained surgical item (RSI) remains a serious patient safety risk in perioperative nursing, with surgical sponges representing the most common RSI. After an RSI event involving a sponge occurred at a large academic medical center, a root cause analysis identified the stacking of sponge bags as a contributing factor. The nurse innovator was tasked with finding a solution. A telescopic sponge-counting system (SCS) prototype, featuring expandable arms, allowed visualization of 120 sponges without stacking bags. A three-phase evaluation was conducted: a staff assessment of the standard SCS currently in use and testing of the initial SCS prototype in a simulated environment; beta testing the prototype in clinical practice; and chart audits comparing outcomes between the standard SCS and the prototype. The SCS prototype demonstrated improved visibility, functionality, safety, and staff satisfaction during practice. This SCS has the potential to reduce sponge-related RSIs by eliminating the stacking of sponge bags.

Indexed as

Foreign BodiesSurgical SpongesEquipment DesignHumansPatient Safetynursing innovationproduct developmentprototype evaluationretained surgical items (RSIs)sponge‐counting system (SCS)

Identifiers

PMID42644851
PMCPMC13511283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.