Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42644845›Full record

ArticleAORN journal2026

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Improve Perioperative Staffing Consistency: A Quality Improvement Initiative at a Large Academic Medical Center.

Dio Sumagaysay, Taryn Tomlinson, Hugh Cassidy, Allyn Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AORN journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dio Sumagaysay
Taryn Tomlinson
Hugh Cassidy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A large academic medical center in the Pacific Northwest addressed perioperative staffing challenges by implementing a workflow with application of AI assistance to optimize daily assignments. The initiative integrated real-time and historical data to support consistent matching of staff competencies and procedure experience with scheduled procedures and surgeons. The workflow streamlined processes and saved service line coordinators 20 hours per week and nurse leaders 5 hours per week. Surgical staffing consistency improved by 30 percentage points, from 50% to 80%, and staff and surgeon sentiment improved. By enhancing visibility into documented competencies and procedure history and reducing reliance on manual assignments, the initiative improved the reliability and efficiency of daily staffing decisions while reinforcing safe alignment of skills with procedure complexity. Implementation success was supported by multidisciplinary collaboration and iterative workflow refinement. This article outlines the implementation approach, observed outcomes, and key operational considerations for health systems pursuing similar innovations.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePersonnel Staffing and SchedulingQuality ImprovementAcademic Medical CentersHumansWorkflowartificial intelligence (AI)OR efficiencyperioperative staffingworkflow automationworkforce optimization

Identifiers

PMID42644845
PMCPMC13511367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.