Trial reportJNCI cancer spectrum2026
Race, ethnicity, and prior colorectal screening test use in CONFIRM colonoscopy vs fecal immunochemical testing trial participants.
Trial report in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05612347 (Colonoscopy Versus Stool-based Testing for Older Adults With a History of Colon Polyps), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Colonoscopy Versus Stool-based Testing for Older Adults With a History of Colon Polyps
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes vary by race and ethnicity, and screening test use may contribute to this variation. We examined the association of race, ethnicity, and associated factors with CRC screening test use in a setting where financial barriers to screening are mitigated.
methodsSurvey information was gathered from US veteran participants (n = 50 125) when enrolled into a randomized trial comparing screening colonoscopy to annual fecal immunochemical testing in the prevention of CRC mortality. The primary exposures of interest were the participants' self-identified race and ethnicity, with adjustment for variables capturing access to care. Multivariable logistic regression, stratified by site and age, was used to assess the relationship between exposures of interest and prior use of any CRC screening test, prior colonoscopy, and prior fecal occult blood test (including fecal immunochemical testing) use.
resultsScreening test use was common (n = 28 330 [56.5%]), with more veterans reporting prior fecal occult blood testing (n = 20 386 [40.7%]) than prior colonoscopy (n = 12 671 [25.3%]). In multivariable analysis, Black participants were more likely (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01 to 1.12) to have had any prior screening relative to White persons, and this finding was driven by more frequent fecal occult blood testing use relative to White persons (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.23). There was no association between Hispanic ethnicity (relative to White persons) on the primary outcomes.
conclusionsIn this cohort, prior screening test use was common, with observed variation in overall test use by race, but not ethnicity. Further study of CRC screening test use in diverse populations is needed. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV ID: NCT#05612347 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05612347).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.