Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42644818›Full record

Trial reportJNCI cancer spectrum2026

Race, ethnicity, and prior colorectal screening test use in CONFIRM colonoscopy vs fecal immunochemical testing trial participants.

Douglas J Robertson, Jason A Dominitz, Alexander Beed, Kathy Boardman, Barbara J Del Curto, Peter D Guarino, Grant D Huang, Thomas F Imperiale, Andrew LaCasse, Meaghan Larson and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05612347 (Colonoscopy Versus Stool-based Testing for Older Adults With a History of Colon Polyps), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05612347 narecruitingnot on this map

Colonoscopy Versus Stool-based Testing for Older Adults With a History of Colon Polyps

TypeinterventionalSponsorDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterRan2023 to 2035Enrolled8,946ConditionsColorectal Polyp, Colorectal Neoplasms, Colorectal Adenoma, Colorectal CancerArmsFIT, Colonoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Douglas J RobertsonGastroenterology Section, VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5934-3388
Jason A DominitzGastroenterology Section, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8070-7086
Alexander BeedCooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7533-8175
Kathy BoardmanDepartment of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program, Clinical Research Pharmacy Coordinating Center, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Barbara J Del CurtoDepartment of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program, Clinical Research Pharmacy Coordinating Center, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Peter D GuarinoStatistical Center of HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-4865-7307
Grant D HuangOffice of Research and Development, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1217-0002
Thomas F ImperialeCenter for Innovation, Health Services Research and Development, Department of Medicine, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Andrew LaCasseGastroenterology Section, VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, United States.
Meaghan LarsonGastroenterology Section, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States.
Samir GuptaSection of Gastroenterology, VA San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
David LiebermanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, OR, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1073-5401
Beata PlanetaCooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, United States.
Timothy J O'LearyOffice of Research and Development, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2435-9136
Aasma ShaukatDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, New York Harbor Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, New York, NY, United States.
Shanaz SultanDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Tassos C KyriakidesCooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8913-108X
CONFIRM Study Group

Funding

US Department of Veterans Affairs, Cooperative Studies Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes vary by race and ethnicity, and screening test use may contribute to this variation. We examined the association of race, ethnicity, and associated factors with CRC screening test use in a setting where financial barriers to screening are mitigated.

methodsSurvey information was gathered from US veteran participants (n = 50 125) when enrolled into a randomized trial comparing screening colonoscopy to annual fecal immunochemical testing in the prevention of CRC mortality. The primary exposures of interest were the participants' self-identified race and ethnicity, with adjustment for variables capturing access to care. Multivariable logistic regression, stratified by site and age, was used to assess the relationship between exposures of interest and prior use of any CRC screening test, prior colonoscopy, and prior fecal occult blood test (including fecal immunochemical testing) use.

resultsScreening test use was common (n = 28 330 [56.5%]), with more veterans reporting prior fecal occult blood testing (n = 20 386 [40.7%]) than prior colonoscopy (n = 12 671 [25.3%]). In multivariable analysis, Black participants were more likely (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01 to 1.12) to have had any prior screening relative to White persons, and this finding was driven by more frequent fecal occult blood testing use relative to White persons (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.23). There was no association between Hispanic ethnicity (relative to White persons) on the primary outcomes.

conclusionsIn this cohort, prior screening test use was common, with observed variation in overall test use by race, but not ethnicity. Further study of CRC screening test use in diverse populations is needed. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV ID: NCT#05612347 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05612347).

Indexed as

ColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerOccult BloodAgedBlack or African AmericanFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedUnited StatesVeteransWhite

Identifiers

PMID42644818
PMCPMC13597112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.