Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42644761›Full record

ReviewChemSusChem2026

Critical Review on Enzymatic and Chemo-Catalytic Oxidation of Glucose Into Sugar Acids.

Haixin Guo, Xinhua Qi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ChemSusChem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haixin GuoAgro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-0864-5845
Xinhua QiCollege of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-3227-7341

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 22508200National Natural Science Foundation of China 22578226Tianjin Natural Science Foundation Project 25JCYBJC00300Tianjin Natural Science Foundation Project 25JCZDJC01000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The catalytic conversion of biomass is recognized as a promising sustainable strategy for synthesis of high-value organic acids, which is conducive to alleviating the fossil energy and mitigating environmental pollution. The sugar acids such as gluconic acid and glucaric acid serve as efficient metal chelators, key comonomers, and essential additives in the food, medical, and industrial fields, exhibiting broad market prospects and high application value. This review summarizes the research progress of glucose oxidation to sugar acids via enzymatic and chemical catalytic systems. It focuses on the catalyst synthesis, structural characteristics, and catalytic performance of supported metal catalysts with different types of supports. The structure-activity relationships of these catalysts and their intrinsic reaction mechanisms in glucose oxidation are analyzed and discussed. Furthermore, the potential of emerging catalytic technologies (e.g., photocatalytic oxidation and electrocatalytic oxidation) is highlighted, as these technologies enable milder operating conditions compared to traditional heterogeneous catalytic oxidation systems. The industrial application potential of different processes for oxidation of glucose to sugar acid is evaluated, and the challenges, bottlenecks, and future research directions are discussed. This review aims to provide theoretical guidance and technical support for the sustainable and efficient production of sugar acids from biomass-derived glucose.

Indexed as

EnzymesGlucoseSugar AcidsCatalysisOxidation-ReductionEnzymesGlucoseSugar Acidsbiomass valorizationelectrochemical oxidationheterogeneous catalystphotochemical oxidationsugar acid

Identifiers

PMID42644761
PMCPMC13510122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.