Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42644503›Full record

ArticleGM crops & food2026

U.S. consumers' processing of information about CRISPR-edited pork products.

Joseph Opoku Gakpo, Bhavisha Gulabrai, Catherine E Sanders, Jean A Parrella, Joe Proudman, Trish Berger, Frank Mitloehner

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in GM crops & food, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joseph Opoku GakpoDepartment of Agricultural and Human Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Bhavisha GulabraiDepartment of Agricultural and Human Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Catherine E SandersDepartment of Agricultural and Human Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5787-8752
Jean A ParrellaDepartment of Agricultural, Leadership, and Community Education, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Joe ProudmanClarity and Leadership for Environmental Awareness and Research (CLEAR) Center, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Trish BergerClarity and Leadership for Environmental Awareness and Research (CLEAR) Center, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Frank MitloehnerClarity and Leadership for Environmental Awareness and Research (CLEAR) Center, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The commercialization of CRISPR gene-edited pork is advancing rapidly, following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's approval of gene-edited pigs resistant to Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS). As these products move closer to market entry, understanding how consumers seek, process, and avoid information about them is critical for developing effective communication strategies. Guided by the Risk Information Seeking and Processing (RISP) model, this study examined factors influencing information seeking, information avoidance, and information processing related to CRISPR-edited pork products among U.S. consumers (

Indexed as

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsConsumer BehaviorGene EditingAdolescentAdultAnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsFemaleHumansInformation Seeking BehaviorMaleMiddle AgedSwineUnited StatesYoung AdultCRISPRevidence-based communicationgene editinginformation processingRISP model

Identifiers

PMID42644503
PMCPMC13524004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.