ReviewMedical gas research2027
Therapeutic gases and the Nrf2/Keap1 pathway: direct thiol modification vs . indirect modulation.
Review in Medical gas research, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2/Kelch-like Ech-associated protein 1 (Nrf2/Keap1) pathway is a central homeostatic module that integrates oxidant, electrophilic, inflammatory, and metabolic signals into adaptive transcriptional programs. In parallel, nitric oxide (NO), hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S), and molecular hydrogen (H 2 ) have emerged as therapeutically relevant gaseous mediators with distinct chemical identities, tissue distribution profiles, and pharmacological constraints. This review re-examines these gases through a single organizing question: how can highly dissimilar small molecules converge on the same redox-defense hub? We compare the direct cysteine chemistry of NO and H 2 S with the mainly indirect actions proposed for H 2 , and we use the Nrf2/Keap1 axis as the mechanistic backbone for that comparison. NO and H 2 S are best understood as redox-active signaling gases capable of covalent protein modification, whereas H 2 appears to act largely by reshaping upstream oxidative events, mitochondrial electron leakage, membrane lipid oxidation products, and stress-responsive signaling states. Despite these differences, all three gases can feed into overlapping kinase pathways, mitochondrial quality-control networks, and cytoprotective gene programs. A second goal of this review is to move beyond single-gas narratives. We discuss the extent to which gas-gas crosstalk, especially between NO and H 2 S and the buffering role proposed for H 2 under severe oxidative stress, may create systems-level convergence rather than simple additive antioxidant effects. We argue that the most productive conceptual model is not "one gas, one target", but a context-dependent gas signaling network centered on Nrf2/Keap1, mitochondrial adaptation, and thiol chemistry. Finally, we assess the translational implications of this framework across ischemia-reperfusion injury, neurodegeneration, metabolic disease, and aging. We highlight the practical constraints that still limit clinical implementation, including dose windows, burst release, tissue targeting, biomarker selection, and the difficulty of tracking reversible cysteine modifications in vivo . By placing NO, H 2 S, and H 2 into one comparative redox framework, this review aims to clarify what is established, what remains inferential, and where future combination strategies may realistically emerge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.