Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42644345›Full record

ReviewMedical gas research2027

Therapeutic gases and the Nrf2/Keap1 pathway: direct thiol modification vs . indirect modulation.

Te Xiao, Chao Xia, Lisha Huang, Yanqi Li, Mengyu Liu, Pengxiang Zhao, Xuemei Ma, Fei Xie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical gas research, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Te XiaoCollege of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Chao XiaCollege of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Lisha HuangCollege of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Yanqi LiCollege of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Mengyu LiuCollege of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Pengxiang ZhaoCollege of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Xuemei MaCollege of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Fei XieCollege of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6581-3964

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2/Kelch-like Ech-associated protein 1 (Nrf2/Keap1) pathway is a central homeostatic module that integrates oxidant, electrophilic, inflammatory, and metabolic signals into adaptive transcriptional programs. In parallel, nitric oxide (NO), hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S), and molecular hydrogen (H 2 ) have emerged as therapeutically relevant gaseous mediators with distinct chemical identities, tissue distribution profiles, and pharmacological constraints. This review re-examines these gases through a single organizing question: how can highly dissimilar small molecules converge on the same redox-defense hub? We compare the direct cysteine chemistry of NO and H 2 S with the mainly indirect actions proposed for H 2 , and we use the Nrf2/Keap1 axis as the mechanistic backbone for that comparison. NO and H 2 S are best understood as redox-active signaling gases capable of covalent protein modification, whereas H 2 appears to act largely by reshaping upstream oxidative events, mitochondrial electron leakage, membrane lipid oxidation products, and stress-responsive signaling states. Despite these differences, all three gases can feed into overlapping kinase pathways, mitochondrial quality-control networks, and cytoprotective gene programs. A second goal of this review is to move beyond single-gas narratives. We discuss the extent to which gas-gas crosstalk, especially between NO and H 2 S and the buffering role proposed for H 2 under severe oxidative stress, may create systems-level convergence rather than simple additive antioxidant effects. We argue that the most productive conceptual model is not "one gas, one target", but a context-dependent gas signaling network centered on Nrf2/Keap1, mitochondrial adaptation, and thiol chemistry. Finally, we assess the translational implications of this framework across ischemia-reperfusion injury, neurodegeneration, metabolic disease, and aging. We highlight the practical constraints that still limit clinical implementation, including dose windows, burst release, tissue targeting, biomarker selection, and the difficulty of tracking reversible cysteine modifications in vivo . By placing NO, H 2 S, and H 2 into one comparative redox framework, this review aims to clarify what is established, what remains inferential, and where future combination strategies may realistically emerge.

Indexed as

GasesHydrogen SulfideKelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1NF-E2-Related Factor 2Nitric OxideSignal TransductionSulfhydryl CompoundsAnimalsHumansHydrogenOxidation-ReductionGasesHydrogenHydrogen SulfideKelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1NF-E2-Related Factor 2Nitric OxideSulfhydryl Compoundsgasotransmitterhydrogen sulfideKeap1mitochondrial quality controlmolecular hydrogennitric oxideNrf2persulfidationredox signalingS-nitrosylation

Identifiers

PMID42644345
PMCPMC13667377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.