ArticleEndocrine connections2026
Post-cycle therapy after androgen abuse: a narrative review of mechanisms, evidence, and clinical perspectives.
Article in Endocrine connections, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-cycle therapy (PCT) refers to the use of pharmacological agents - most commonly selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) - after cessation of androgen abuse to accelerate recovery of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis. Exogenous androgens suppress endogenous testosterone production through negative feedback, often resulting in a transient hypogonadal state that may persist for weeks to months, and occasionally longer, depending on cycle characteristics and individual factors. The rationale of PCT is to mitigate this suppression and reduce symptoms of androgen deficiency. However, evidence supporting its use is limited, with most data derived from observational studies or extrapolated from other forms of secondary hypogonadism. While some studies suggest that PCT may accelerate short-term hormonal and seminal recovery, spontaneous recovery occurs in the majority of individuals within months after cessation. Three perspectives can be distinguished. In real-world practice, PCT is widely used, often without medical supervision, driven by cultural norms and concerns about symptom persistence. From an academic standpoint, PCT is generally not recommended because of uncertain benefits and potential risks. A third perspective describes a pragmatic rationale for considering a short course of PCT in carefully selected individuals with significant symptom burden or risk of relapse into androgen abuse, while acknowledging that this approach is not supported by robust clinical evidence. This review aims to clarify the rationale, evidence gaps, and clinical implications of these perspectives to support informed clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.