ArticleJournal of immunology research2026
Cost-Effective and Time-Saving Multiplex-Beads Immunoassay Method to Detect Humoral Immune Responses Against Respiratory Infections.
Article in Journal of immunology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The multiplex-bead immunoassay is characterized by its ability to detect multiple analytes simultaneously within a short timeframe and with high precision. Consequently, it is an appealing tool for identifying humoral immune responses to various targets, particularly respiratory viral infections that pose a significant risk to public health. In this study, we optimize the assay by using minimal reagent volumes to reduce both costs and turnaround time without compromising assay accuracy. We have developed a multiplex-bead immunoassay to detect humoral responses against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome COVID-19 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome COVID-19 (MERS-CoV) on a platform that can be extended to include additional targets. To validate the performance of the developed assay, serum samples from MERS-CoV- and SARS-CoV-2-seropositive and seronegative individuals were evaluated and compared with the standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. The results demonstrate that the developed multiplex-bead immunoassay exhibits high performance, achieving 100% sensitivity and 95.4%-96.6% specificity, a detection limit comparable to ELISA, and a strong correlation with ELISA (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.