Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42644209›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2026

Compositional Complexity in Text and Images.

Helena Balabin, Antonietta Gabriella Liuzzi, Kevin Statz, Marie-Francine Moens, Patrick Dupont, Rik Vandenberghe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Helena BalabinLaboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6392-9306
Antonietta Gabriella LiuzziLaboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8960-5601
Kevin StatzLaboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7400-7006
Marie-Francine MoensLanguage Intelligence and Information Retrieval Lab, Department of Computer Science, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3732-9323
Patrick DupontLaboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1980-2540
Rik VandenbergheLaboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6237-2502

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compositionality enables us to derive the meaning of a complex whole from the syntax and semantics of its individual parts. While compositional processing has primarily been studied in language, similar principles apply to visual scenes, in which meaning can be derived from their individual parts and the relationships between them. In this study, we therefore aimed to explore whether there is a shared neural basis for compositional processing in text and images. Based on abstract meaning representation graphs for text, commonly used to capture "who is doing what to whom", and action graph annotations for visual scenes, we defined an analogous graph depth-based notion of compositional complexity. By conducting a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment in which participants view text-image pairs from the Common Objects in Context-Actions data set, we aimed to identify brain activity patterns related to compositional processing through a combination of univariate and multivariate pattern analysis. Specifically, we hypothesized that there are shared brain regions-such as the pars opercularis, pars triangularis or anterior temporal lobe-involved in processing compositional complexity across text and images. Alternatively, there might exist distinct regions for processing compositional complexity in text and images, without any substantial cross-modal overlap. Our results provided no evidence in support of either hypothesis: no significant neural responses to compositional complexity were observed, in either a shared or modality-specific manner. Given the rigorous control of confounds in our study design, the operationalization of compositional complexity itself may underlie the null result.

Indexed as

compositionalityfunctional magnetic resonance imagingmultivariate pattern analysis

Identifiers

PMID42644209
PMCPMC13506228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.