Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42644203›Full record

ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine

Clinical and radiological outcomes after three- and four-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A single-center case series of 113 patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Mehdi Darmoul, Amine Trifa, Ghassen Elkahla, Kais Maamri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mehdi DarmoulNeurosurgery Department, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia.
Amine TrifaNeurosurgery Department, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia.
Ghassen ElkahlaNeurosurgery Department, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia.
Kais MaamriNeurosurgery Department, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a standard procedure for cervical spine disorders, although multilevel ACDF (≥3 levels) is less frequently performed. This study evaluates the long-term clinical outcomes and effects on cervical sagittal balance following three- and four-level ACDF. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients treated for cervical spondylotic myelopathy with multilevel ACDF over 11 years. Patients were divided into two groups: three-level (Group 1) and four-level (Group 2). Clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed postoperatively and at 3, 12, and 24 months. Outcome measures included the Visual Analog Scale, neck disability index, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and Odom's criteria. Radiological evaluation included C2-C7 Cobb angle, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and C7 slope. Results: A total of 113 patients (mean age 54.35 years) were included in the study. Most presented with neck pain and brachial neuralgia, with moderate-to-severe myelopathy on JOA scoring. Preoperative imaging frequently showed loss of cervical lordosis or kyphosis, with magnetic resonance imaging confirming multilevel cord compression. Of the cohort, 102 patients underwent three-level ACDF and 11 underwent four-level ACDF. Complications occurred in 14.1% of cases, mainly transient dysphagia. At a mean follow-up of 35.6 months, both groups demonstrated significant improvements in clinical scores and sagittal alignment. Conclusion: Multilevel ACDF is a safe and effective treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, offering sustained clinical and radiological improvement with acceptable complication rates.

Indexed as

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusioncomplicationsfour levelsoutcomesthree levels

Identifiers

PMID42644203
PMCPMC13506117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.