Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42644112›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

Impacts of incentivizing milk spending among SNAP participants.

Vikas Mishra, Joel Cuffey, Kara Newby, Alicia Powers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vikas MishraHunger Solutions Institute, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2152-9723
Joel CuffeyDepartment of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2481-272X
Kara NewbyHunger Solutions Institute, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2530-4521
Alicia PowersHunger Solutions Institute, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0734-1524

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Incentive programs to encourage healthier eating among US households generally focus on fruits and vegetables, and little is known about incentivizing other components of a healthy diet. The Healthy Fluid Milk Incentive (HFMI) funds projects that provide discounts for households participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) when they purchase lower-fat milk products. Methods: We used transaction data from a large retailer participating in an HFMI project (Add Milk) to estimate the impact of HFMI discounts on sales of different types of milk. We measured monthly spending among households that consistently purchased milk at the retailer. We used difference-in-differences and event study models to estimate the impact of Add Milk on SNAP households compared with non-SNAP households. Results: We found that Add Milk discounts increased spending on 1% milk among SNAP households by up to 21.0% and did not impact fat-free milk spending. The program took over 6 months to see an impact. Sales of higher-fat milk were reduced and sales of flavored milk were not affected. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate the feasibility of incentivizing dietary components beyond fruits and vegetables but the difficulty of inducing substitution away from less-healthy items.

Indexed as

milknutrition incentivesSNAP

Identifiers

PMID42644112
PMCPMC13505516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.