ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026
Medicaid payment policies for methadone maintenance treatment for opioid use disorder, 2020-2025.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The potential of methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) to address the opioid crisis has been limited by restrictive federal and local policies that require frequent clinic visits for medication. Unprecedented federal regulatory changes started in early COVID-19 and were made permanent in 2024, allowing clinics increased flexibility in granting take-home medication to patients. Medicaid payment policies can profoundly shape provider behaviors but may not align with regulatory changes. Methods: We conducted a systematic synthesis of Medicaid MMT payment and billing policies among 40 states over March 2020-July 2025. Results: More than half of the states continued to adopt a per-dose or per-diem approach to paying for methadone dosing and a per-service approach to paying for addiction counseling, thus tying Medicaid revenue closely to clinic visits. More than one-quarter maintained a flat bundled payment dating back to prepandemic era that provided little incentive for granting patients more than 1 week of take-home medication. Adoption of a 2-tiered bundled payment modeled after Medicare's payment increased over time but remained limited. Conclusion: Medicaid payment policies for MMT saw limited changes over the 5 years following initial federal regulatory changes. Practice changes toward more flexible and patient-centered care may be hindered without compatible changes in payment approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.