Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42644103›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

Medicaid payment policies for methadone maintenance treatment for opioid use disorder, 2020-2025.

Yuhua Bao, Promi Chakraborty, Kayla Hutchings, Shashi N Kapadia, Noa Krawczyk, Bruce R Schackman, Barbara Andraka-Christou, Ju-Chen Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuhua BaoDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10022, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3825-4327
Promi ChakrabortyDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10022, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4689-1408
Kayla HutchingsDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10022, United States.
Shashi N KapadiaDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10022, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6363-2839
Noa KrawczykDepartment of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7396-3938
Bruce R SchackmanDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10022, United States.
Barbara Andraka-ChristouSchool of Global Health Management and Informatics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6307-6369
Ju-Chen HuDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Celia Scott Weatherhead School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70112, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5201-3557

Funding

HEAL Data2Action Modeling and Economic Resource CenterU24DA057650 · NIDA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Benjamin P. Linas, KATHRYN E MCCOLLISTER · 2022 to 2026
$8.1M
NIDA NIH HHS U24 DA057650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The potential of methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) to address the opioid crisis has been limited by restrictive federal and local policies that require frequent clinic visits for medication. Unprecedented federal regulatory changes started in early COVID-19 and were made permanent in 2024, allowing clinics increased flexibility in granting take-home medication to patients. Medicaid payment policies can profoundly shape provider behaviors but may not align with regulatory changes. Methods: We conducted a systematic synthesis of Medicaid MMT payment and billing policies among 40 states over March 2020-July 2025. Results: More than half of the states continued to adopt a per-dose or per-diem approach to paying for methadone dosing and a per-service approach to paying for addiction counseling, thus tying Medicaid revenue closely to clinic visits. More than one-quarter maintained a flat bundled payment dating back to prepandemic era that provided little incentive for granting patients more than 1 week of take-home medication. Adoption of a 2-tiered bundled payment modeled after Medicare's payment increased over time but remained limited. Conclusion: Medicaid payment policies for MMT saw limited changes over the 5 years following initial federal regulatory changes. Practice changes toward more flexible and patient-centered care may be hindered without compatible changes in payment approaches.

Indexed as

bundled paymentMedicaid payment policiesmethadone maintenance treatment

Identifiers

PMID42644103
PMCPMC13505517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.