Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42644090›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

Structure without semantics: no evidence for bonobo compositionality in Berthet et al. (2025).

Andreas Wartel, Johan Lind, Johan Lundin Kleberg, Claudio Tennie, Markus Jonsson, Anna Jon-And, Axel Ekström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andreas WartelCentre for Cultural Evolution, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan LindCentre for Cultural Evolution, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4159-6926
Johan Lundin KlebergDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Claudio TennieFaculty of Science, WG Early Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5302-4925
Markus JonssonCentre for Cultural Evolution, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna Jon-AndCentre for Cultural Evolution, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Axel EkströmCentre for Cultural Evolution, Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6739-0838

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the evolutionary origins of combinatorial communication has motivated studies that analyse the semantic capacities of great ape vocal repertoires. A prominent example is the study by Berthet et al. (2025), which used Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) on a large multidimensional dataset of bonobo calls and concluded that certain call combinations exhibit compositional meaning. We applied the published analytical pipeline to randomized datasets lacking any genuine association between call types and contextual features. Depending on implementation choices, the procedure identified significant relationships in 34.5-84.3% of simulations, suggesting substantial inflation of false-positive results. We therefore re-examined the statistical assumptions underlying the analysis itself. Because the MCA was constructed from repeated measures and uneven sampling across call types, its geometry reflects sampling frequencies and hierarchical dependencies in addition to any semantic structure. As such, any subsequent linear modelling of distances within this fixed space further violates assumptions of independence. We introduced a full permutation test in which a weighted MCA is recomputed under random reassignment of call-type labels, thereby generating a null distribution that respects the dependence structure of the data. Applying this procedure to the original dataset yielded a non-significant Monte Carlo

Indexed as

Pan paniscusSemanticsVocalization, AnimalAnimalsEvolution of languageMetasciencePrimatesStatisticsVocalization

Identifiers

PMID42644090
PMCPMC13505523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.