ArticleChild & youth care forum2026
An Idiographic, Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding Adolescent-Dog Relationships in the Context of Social Anxiety.
Article in Child & youth care forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Social anxiety is prevalent among adolescents, however there is limited research examining how adolescents with social anxiety can be supported in coping adaptively with stressors. In particular, close relationships with dogs may provide regulation and support in this context. Objective: The objective of this study is to use an idiographic, mixed methods approach to explore adolescent-dog relationships in real-life contexts. Methods: We present four illustrative cases of adolescents with high levels of social anxiety who represent a range of levels of pet-dog relationship quality, integrating quantitative and qualitative data sources: (1) continuous electrodermal activity using ambulatory psychophysiological sensors to measure arousal, (2) ecological momentary assessment of real-time of emotion and behavior, (3) quantitative survey data from both adolescents and parents/guardians, and (4) in-depth qualitative interviews (conducted separately with both parents and youth). Results: Findings indicate individual variability in how and when adolescents seek proximity to their dogs and in the coherence between physiological arousal, loneliness, and positive/negative affect. This variability was often linked to the strength of the adolescent's relationship with their dog. There were differential patterns in the quality of adolescent-dog relationships and how this relationship may be linked to anxiety reduction, with some youth reporting a pathway between their dog relationship and outcomes and others showing no clear associations. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the value of combining digital phenotyping with qualitative narratives to explore lived experiences of adolescent anxiety. Findings highlight the potential for more personalized, ecologically valid interventions that leverage existing family and pet relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.