ArticleNature health2026
Feasibility and outcomes of the DNA Screen nationwide adult genomic screening pilot.
Article in Nature health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Geographic and Social Equity in Population-Wide Genomic Screening.JAMA network open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Population genomic screening enables the identification of individuals at high risk of medically actionable conditions before disease onset, yet real-world feasibility studies are lacking. Informed by prior cost-effectiveness modelling, we conducted a prospective nationwide pilot targeting young adults in Australia (aged 18 to 40 years), offering genomic screening for 10 genes linked to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Lynch syndrome, and familial hypercholesterolemia. Of 30,017 registrants, 18,573 were invited and 10,263 completed genomic screening (median age 31.9 years; 45.5% men; 30.0% culturally or linguistically diverse). We detected pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in 202 (2.0%). Of the 189 referred for clinical follow-up, 97.9% accepted and 87.3% attended appointments. Notably, 74.5% of attendees were ineligible for government-funded criteria-based genomic testing. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of adult population genomic screening, including high public engagement, clinical uptake, and identification of individuals ineligible for current criteria, supporting the further development of adult population genomic screening in Australia.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.