ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2026
Ultramassive transfusion in an urban level 1 trauma center: a case series.
Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 20 units and beyond: where is the line between utility and futility?Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This case series examines 27 trauma patients who met criteria for ultra massive transfusion protocol (UMTP), defined as receiving over 20 units of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) within 24 hours of admission. Methods: In this case series, 27 trauma patients were identified (≥16 years old) who received over 20 units of pRBCs within the first 24 hours of presentation in the emergency department (2016 to 2020). The data collected included patient demographics, injury type, initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), transfusions, hemostatic adjunct use within 24 hours, lactate, in-hospital complications, length of stay, injury severity score, and mortality. The study was approved by the institutional review board. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. Results: This series primarily consisted of penetrating injuries (79%) and males (81%) with a median age of 31 years. Median admission GCS was 12 (IQR 10 to 15) (survivors: 14 (IQR 14 to 15), non-survivors: 8 (IQR 8 to 15)). Median length of stay was 10 days. Seven patients underwent resuscitative thoracotomy (29% survival), and all 27 patients required operation. Three patients (11%) received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during transport, all of whom died. Median transfusion volumes within 24 hours were 36 units of pRBCs, 26 units of fresh frozen plasma (FFP), five units of PLT, and three units of cryoprecipitate.50% of patients received unbalanced ratios (>1.5:1) of pRBCs to FFP, and 60.7% received unbalanced ratios of pRBCs to PLT. Despite aggressive resuscitation, nearly half of the patients died by discharge, demonstrating the severity of their conditions. Conclusion: UMTPs represent a critical component of modern trauma care. Although advancements have been made in protocol development, challenges remain in optimizing outcomes. Admission GCS of 3, age >50 years, resuscitative thoracotomy, and thrombocytopenia are important mortality predictors and should be considered with transport factors when analyzing which patients will benefit from aggressive resuscitation. Level of evidence: IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.