ReviewParkinson's disease2026
Identification of the Medicine-Related Priorities for People With Parkinson's During Hospitalisation: A Systematic Review Using Meta-Ethnography.
Review in Parkinson's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: People with Parkinson's (PwP) experience disproportionately higher rates of hospitalisation, where they encounter many medication-related challenges. Although interventions have been developed to address these issues, medication-related problems persist, and the patient's voice is largely absent from their design. Objectives: To explore medication-related priorities during hospitalisation from the perspective of PwP to inform the development of future patient-led interventions. Methods: A systematic review using meta-ethnography was conducted and registered with PROSPERO. A SPICE-informed search (Setting, Perspective, Intervention, Comparison, Evaluation) was undertaken across MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase and Google Scholar in June 2025. Eligible qualitative and mixed-method studies explored the perspectives of PwP regarding inpatient medication-related care. Two reviewers independently screened studies using Covidence. First- and second-order constructs were synthesised into third-order constructs representing medication-related priorities. Reporting followed Enhancing Meta-Ethnography Reporting Guidance (eMERGe), and methodological quality was appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. Results: Four studies met the inclusion criteria. Four overarching themes reflected the core medication-related priorities of PwP during hospitalisation: timely and accurate medication administration, autonomy, access to skilled and knowledgeable staff, and advocacy to support patient needs. These priorities informed the development of an interpretive conceptual framework illustrating the interaction between PwP medication-related priorities and hospital systems. Conclusions: Findings suggest the need to strengthen systems supporting timely medication administration, enable self-administration where appropriate, promote flexibility and person-centred care, and implement Parkinson's clinical champions to advocate for and support PwP throughout hospitalisation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.