Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42644007›Full record

ArticleEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.)2026

Desalination of Seawater: Comprehensive Nontarget Assessment of Disinfection Byproducts.

Walid El-Shorbagy, Amy A Cuthbertson, Ryan Harren, Elizabeth D Wagner, Michael J Plewa, Susan D Richardson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environment & health (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Walid El-ShorbagyDepartment of Ocean Engineering, Texas A&M University, Galveston, Texas 77554, United States.
Amy A CuthbertsonDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, United States.
Ryan HarrenStudent Services Authority, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Athens, Georgia 30605, United States.
Elizabeth D WagnerDepartment of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3198-2727
Michael J PlewaDepartment of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8307-1629
Susan D RichardsonDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6207-4513

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to growing populations and water scarcity, desalination is increasingly used to generate safe drinking water. A concern is the potential formation of more toxic brominated and iodinated disinfection byproducts (DBPs) in the finished drinking water. While desalination technologies remove much of the organic matter and bromide/iodide precursors to DBP formation, lower molecular weight, uncharged compounds and salts are not completely removed. We present a comprehensive nontarget identification of DBPs from desalination, using a broadscreen, comprehensive approach with gas chromatography (GC)-high resolution-mass spectrometry (MS) to identify DBPs produced in desalinated waters treated with chlorine, chlorine dioxide, ozone, chloramine, and UV. We include real desalinated waters from three large desalination plants in the United Arab Emirates, along with controlled laboratory treatments of these waters, allowing a direct comparison of different disinfectants. Mammalian cell cytotoxicity analyses for new desalination DBPs are also reported, along with whole-water toxicology for treated desalinated waters. Fifty-five DBPs were identified, including many reported for the first time in desalinated water, including a new dibromomethyl-pyrazole, along with haloketones, haloaldehydes, halonitromethanes, haloamides, and >2 carbon haloacids. Di- and tribromophenols had greater cytotoxicity compared to corresponding regulated di- and trihaloacetic acids. Reverse osmosis (RO)-treated waters had higher cytotoxicity than distilled waters (multistage flash and multieffect distillation). Of the RO-treated waters, samples treated with ozone-chlorine had highest cytotoxicity, followed by UV, ozone, and chloramine, consistent with increased formation of more toxic bromonitromethanes and dibromoacetic acid with ozone-chlorine. However, DBP levels in the treated desalinated waters and whole-water cytotoxicity were lower than found in typical drinking waters, suggesting that, despite increased formation of brominated DBPs, desalination may produce safer water overall.

Indexed as

DBPsdesalinationdisinfection byproductsmass spectrometrynontarget identification

Identifiers

PMID42644007
PMCPMC13504556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.