Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42643986›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Development of general expertise factor and analysis of its relation to decision-making behavior of gymnastics coaches.

Edvard Kolar, Saša Veličković, Rado Pišot, Maks Tušak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Edvard KolarScience and Research Center Koper, Institute for Behavioral Economics, Koper, Slovenia.
Saša VeličkovićFaculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia.
Rado PišotScience and Research Center Koper, Institute for Kinesiology Research, Koper, Slovenia.
Maks TušakSurgical Clinic, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Coaches may be regarded as highly qualified professionals in elite sport, possessing extended experiences, specialized tertiary education and domain-specific credentials, which designate them as experts in their particular sport discipline. They are a central figure in the development of an athlete's results. In the present study, we developed the concept of the General Expertise Factor (GEF) and investigated the associations between the level of expertise of gymnastics coaches and certain demographic and professional characteristics, as well as their decision-making (hereinafter DM) behavior. Methods: To reveal the structure of the DM style, a general DM style questionnaire was used, to which questions on the demographic and professional characteristics were added. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to identify the correlations, and multiple regression analysis was employed to examine causal associations between measured parameters. In addition, ANOVA was used to detect differences in all measured parameters between groups of coaches defined according to different expertise criterions. Results: The results indicated that development of GEF is based on the premise that expertise in a particular field is multidimensional, whereby dimensions or criterions of domain-specific explicit knowledge, experience, and confirmed results must be simultaneously achieved for an individual coach to be recognized as an expert of the highest rank. Statistically significant differences between individual expert groups of coaches were found for all three selected expertise criteria. Moreover, the comparation of the resulting quality groups of coaches according to their average DM behavior reviled that the groups differ significantly in the use of rational DM style, with rationality in DM consistently increasing in line with the increasing competence or expertise of the representatives of each quality group. Conclusions: Based on the findings we can conclude that the developed GEF well stratifies gymnastics coaches into different levels of competence and expertise and that rationality is one of the important factors that, together with knowledge, experience and achieved success, represents a defining element of coaching expertise. The developed GEF model was also checked for compliance with other, already established theories and models in the fields of expertise and DM, where a high level of consistency was found.

Indexed as

decision-making behaviordemographic characteristicsexpertisegymnastics coachesprofessional characteristics

Identifiers

PMID42643986
PMCPMC13504541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.