ReviewJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine
Management of aneurysmal bone cysts of the spine and sacrum: A narrative review.
Review in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review summarizes contemporary diagnosis and management of aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) of the spine and sacrum, emphasizing axial-specific risks, decision thresholds, and adjunctive therapies. A PubMed/MEDLINE review was performed focusing on the last 10 years, with selective inclusion of earlier foundational studies. Search terms combined "aneurysmal bone cyst" with anatomy-specific modifiers ("spine," "vertebral," and "sacrum") and domains relevant to axial care, including molecular diagnostics such as ubiquitin-specific peptidase 6, imaging, biopsy, differential diagnosis, operative strategies, embolization, percutaneous therapies, and recurrence. ABCs are benign but locally aggressive lesions that frequently involve posterior elements, extend toward the canal, and threaten neurologic function and stability. Imaging may demonstrate expansile osteolysis and fluid-fluid levels but lacks specificity in axial disease; biopsy remains essential to exclude malignant mimics and secondary ABC-like change. Management is individualized based on neurologic compromise, instability, deformity, and lesion extent. Surgical options range from intralesional curettage to more extensive excision with stabilization, while adjuncts such as selective arterial embolization, doxycycline sclerotherapy, and denosumab may support hemorrhage control and local control in selected cases. Recurrence remains most strongly associated with incomplete resection and younger age. Prospective, spine-specific comparative studies are needed to standardize treatment selection, define the sequencing of adjuncts, and clarify long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.