ArticleJournal of inflammation research2026
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis-induced acute lung injury (SALI) is a lethal disorder driven by cytokine storm, immune paralysis, and alveolar barrier collapse. Probiotic-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs), particularly nano-sized vesicles from Methods: After isolating and analyzing LGG-EVs, we used a CLP-induced sepsis model of mouse and an LPS-injured lung organoid model. We tracked the distribution and uptake of LGG-EVs using in vivo imaging and fluorescence microscopy. By using techniques including HE staining, ELISA, qPCR, WB, and IF, the effects of LGG-EVs on sepsis-induced lung injury were explored from the perspectives of pathology, inflammatory factor secretion, and key molecule expression. Results: Utilizing a murine CLP model alongside LPS-stimulated lung organoids, which replicate the alveolar niche, we demonstrated that orally administered LGG-EVs preferentially accumulate in the lungs. These vesicles were found to mitigate tissue injury, suppress systemic inflammation, and restore barrier integrity. Through transcriptomic analyses and mechanistic investigations, it was demonstrated that LGG-EVs target hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α), thereby restoring barrier function by reorganizing tight junctions. Conclusion: Collectively, we identify probiotic-derived EVs as promising pulmonary nanotherapeutics, with oral LGG-EVs emerging as a clinically viable SALI treatment strategy through HIF-1α targeting. This work provides comprehensive preclinical evidence to accelerate the translation of EV-based therapies for critical care applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.