ArticleCureus2026
Temporal Changes in Pediatric Influenza Test Positivity Across COVID-19 Public Health Policy Phases: A Five-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic coincided with substantial changes in respiratory virus circulation, healthcare utilization, and diagnostic testing. Although population-level influenza activity declined markedly in many settings during periods of stringent public health restrictions, patterns among children undergoing clinical testing remain less clearly understood. This study compared pediatric influenza test positivity across pre-pandemic, restriction-dominant pandemic, and post-restriction periods. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 18,035 children who underwent influenza A/B antigen testing at the Department of Pediatrics, Hisar Intercontinental Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye, between January 2018 and May 2023. The study period was divided into the pre-pandemic (January 2018-February 2020), restriction-dominant pandemic (March 2020-June 2021), and post-restriction (July 2021-May 2023) periods. Influenza A and B antigens were detected in nasopharyngeal swab specimens using the GenBody Influenza A/B Ag rapid immunochromatographic assay. Tests performed for the same patient within 14 days were considered part of the same illness episode, and only the first eligible test was included. Influenza test positivity was compared across periods and according to age, sex, influenza type, and seasonality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors independently associated with influenza positivity. Results Of the 18,035 children, 6,691 were tested during the pre-pandemic period, 3,375 during the restriction-dominant period, and 7,969 during the post-restriction period. Influenza was detected in 1,699 (25.4%), 969 (28.7%), and 1,937 (24.3%) children, respectively (P<0.001). Although the proportion of positive tests was highest during the restriction-dominant period, both the testing volume and absolute number of detected cases were lower than before the pandemic. Influenza A positivity increased from 17.1% during the restriction-dominant period to 20.0% after restrictions were relaxed, whereas influenza B positivity declined from 11.6% to 4.4%. Seasonal positivity also varied substantially across the study periods. After adjustment for demographic characteristics, the epidemiological period remained independently associated with influenza test positivity. Conclusions Temporal changes in pediatric influenza test positivity coincided with changes in COVID-19 public health measures. The higher positivity among tested children during the restriction-dominant period occurred in the context of substantially reduced testing and should not be interpreted as increased population-level influenza circulation. Changes in healthcare utilization, testing behavior, and the composition of the tested population should be considered when interpreting these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.