Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42643947›Full record

ArticlePattern recognition2026

A Variational Bayesian Approach for Multimodal Multi-instance Classification.

Yaofang Hu, Yichen Cheng, Yusen Xia, Xinlei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pattern recognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yaofang HuDepartment of Information Systems, Statistics, and Management Science, The University of Alabama, 361 Stadium Dr, Tuscaloosa, 35487, Alabama, USA.
Yichen ChengInstitute for Insight, Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, 55 Park Place, Atlanta, 30303, Georgia, USA.
Yusen XiaInstitute for Insight, Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, 55 Park Place, Atlanta, 30303, Georgia, USA.
Xinlei WangDepartment of Mathematics, University of Texas at Arlington, 411 S Nedderman Dr, Arlington, 76019, Texas, USA.

Funding

Statistical and Deep Generative Modeling for Enhanced CyTOF Data Interpretation and DiscoveryR01GM160515 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS ARLINGTON · PI WANG, XINLEI · 2025 to 2025
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM160515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In multiple instance learning (MIL), objects are represented by bags of instances. Each instance shares the same feature set but has unique feature values. MIL aims to train models that predict bag-level outcomes based on features of these instances, making it a weakly supervised approach due to the lack of instance-level labels. While MIL methods focusing on binary classification are abundant, they often cannot identify which specific instances drive bag labels and have limited or little interpretability. Xiong et al. (2024) introduced MICProB, a Bayesian multiple instance classification (MIC) method that addresses these issues. However, MICProB is computationally intensive and best suited for unimodal instances. To overcome these limitations, we propose vMMIC, a novel variational Bayesian approach for multimodal MIC. vMMIC handles diverse instance types and significantly improves computational efficiency by leveraging Bayesian variational inference, coupled with the data augmentation technique. We benchmark vMMIC against MICProB and many other commonly used MIC approaches on both simulated and real-world data. Results demonstrate vMMIC's superior performance, faster computation, and improved interpretability.

Indexed as

Bayesian hierarchical modelingBinary classificationMean-field variational inferenceWeakly supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID42643947
PMCPMC13505998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.