ArticleFrontiers in insect science2026
Characterization and typology of beekeeping systems: a case study in the district of Tamburco, Apurímac, Peru.
Article in Frontiers in insect science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Beekeeping in rural regions of Peru presents considerable heterogeneity in technification and productivity, which may limit its development. This study aimed to characterize beekeeping systems and identify producer typologies associated with productive characteristics in the district of Tamburco, Apurímac, Peru. Methods: A quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted using a census sample of 34 active beekeepers. Data were collected through a structured and validated questionnaire. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, exploratory hierarchical cluster analysis, association tests, correlation analysis, and complementary multivariate analyses based on FAMD and HCPC. Results: The multivariate analyses identified distinct beekeeper typologies that differed in production scale, educational level, technification, and access to training. Significant associations were observed between cluster structure and several productive and sociodemographic variables, while beekeeping experience was positively associated with production scale. Discussion: Overall, the identified typologies were primarily associated with differences in production scale, technological level, and access to training. These findings may help guide extension and training strategies for beekeepers in Tamburco. Given the relatively small sample size and the cross-sectional design, the findings should be interpreted as exploratory and require validation in larger and geographically diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.