Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42643929›Full record

ArticleNEJM AI2026

MEDS - An Emerging Data Standard and Ecosystem for Health AI Research.

Matthew B A McDermott, Ethan Steinberg, Jason A Fries, Robin P van de Water, Chao Pang, Patrick Rockenschaub, Pawel Renc, Jungwoo Oh, Kamilė Stankevičiūtė, Justin Xu and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NEJM AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Matthew B A McDermottDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6048-9707
Ethan SteinbergCenter for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7166-5032
Jason A FriesCenter for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9316-5768
Robin P van de WaterHasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2895-4872
Chao PangDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9308-8790
Patrick RockenschaubInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health, Health Economics, Medical Statistics and Informatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6499-7933
Pawel RencAGH University of Kraków, Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0487-7454
Jungwoo OhKim Jaechul Graduate School of AI, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul.ORCID 0000-0002-4804-6150
Kamilė StankevičiūtėDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2489-9615
Justin XuBig Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4700-6277
Tom J PollardInstitute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5676-7898
Nassim OufattoleDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-9559-6216
Michael WornowDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2215-6527
Teya S BergamaschiDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1988-3478
Hyewon JeongDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6552-5276
Simon A LeeDepartment of Computational Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3324-9772
Vincent JeanselmeDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6204-666X
Kiril V KleinDepartment of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8779-0209
Mikkel OdgaardDepartment of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9072-0874
Maria E MontgomeryDepartment of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0000-3809-0513
Arkadiusz SitekDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.ORCID 0000-0002-0677-4002
Mads NielsenDepartment of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1535-068X
Jeffrey N ChiangDepartment of Computational Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6843-1355
Noa DaganClalit Research Institute, Clalit Health Services, Faculty of Computer and Information Science, Ramat-Gan, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-8811-7825
Isaac KohaneDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2192-5160
Shalmali JoshiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-0397-1346
Edward ChoiKim Jaechul Graduate School of AI, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul.ORCID 0000-0002-5958-3509
Nigam H ShahCenter for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9385-7158

Funding

Bridge2AI: Patient-Focused Collaborative Hospital Repository Uniting Standards (CHoRUS) for Equitable AIOT2OD032701 · OD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BIHORAC, AZRA, CLERMONT, GILLES · 2022 to 2025
$24.6M
Research Resource for Complex Physiologic SignalsR01EB030362 · NIBIB · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI GOLDBERGER, ARY LOUIS · 2020 to 2025
$5.8M
PhysioNet: A FAIR and sustainable data repositoryU24EB037545 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Thomas Heldt, Tom Pollard · 2025 to 2026
$1.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB030362NIBIB NIH HHS U24 EB037545NIH HHS OT2 OD032701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While data standards have been well adopted and highly impactful for observational health informatics, the emerging application of artificial intelligence (AI) to electronic health record (EHR) data - known broadly as health AI - still lacks broadly adopted data standards. This gap limits reproducibility and the development of open-source ecosystems for health AI, as well as limiting the ability to collaboratively develop and characterize emerging capabilities such as the use of foundation models. The Medical Event Data Standard (MEDS) is an open- source data standard and ecosystem designed and promulgated by us (and others) to address this gap. MEDS was first presented at a workshop in May 2024 and has since been described in online materials and preprints. Here, we describe MEDS in detail and review its use in the community, highlighting its strengths and weaknesses, and the extent of its adoption to date. We designed MEDS to emphasize simplicity, algorithm transportability, and support for workflows used in training foundation models, and to offer complementary strengths compared with existing health data standards. As of March 2026, we find usage of MEDS across 21 institutions, in at least 27 academic papers and preprints, and to support work with 17 datasets and 12 AI algorithms. Tools in the MEDS ecosystem have reported computational speedups that range from 1.9 to around 40,000 times faster than prior tools or common individual workflows. In novel case study comparisons, we find that codebases leveraging MEDS show reductions in necessary lines of functional Python code by up to 70%. Further, the MEDS standard has supported the development of key frontier models for EHR data. (Supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others.).

Identifiers

PMID42643929
PMCPMC13506012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.