ArticleCureus2026
Transcriptomic Features Predict Survival in Glioblastoma Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary malignant brain tumor in adults and demonstrates substantial transcriptomic heterogeneity associated with patient survival. High-dimensional genomic datasets present statistical challenges because the number of measured molecular features often exceeds the number of available patient samples. Penalized regression methods such as Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression enable simultaneous feature selection and survival modeling in these settings.
methodsTranscriptomic expression and survival data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) GBM cohort were analyzed using LASSO-regularized Cox proportional hazards regression implemented through the glmnet package in R. After preprocessing and sample matching, 518 tumor samples and 12,042 transcriptomic features were retained for analysis. Patients were randomly divided into training (n=414) and test (n=104) cohorts. Ten-fold cross-validation using Harrell's concordance index (C-index) was performed to identify optimal regularization parameters. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to evaluate risk stratification performance, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for selected candidate genes.
resultsCross-validation identified a maximum C-index of 0.583 at the optimal lambda.min regularization parameter. The final LASSO-Cox model retained 74 genes with nonzero coefficients. Two identified genes, CLEC5A and RANBP17, overlapped with previously reported GBM prognostic genes from an independent study. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significant survival separation between predicted high-risk and low-risk groups in both the training cohort (log-rank p < 0.0001) and the held-out test cohort (log-rank p < 0.05). ROC analysis of selected candidate genes demonstrated moderate discriminatory performance, with area under the curve values ranging from 0.604 to 0.701.
conclusionsLASSO-regularized Cox regression identified sparse transcriptomic features associated with survival in TCGA GBM patients. Survival stratification performance persisted in a held-out test dataset, supporting the reproducibility of the derived transcriptomic risk model. These findings demonstrate the applicability of penalized survival modeling approaches to high-dimensional cancer transcriptomic datasets and support further investigation of transcriptomic biomarkers in GBM prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.