ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2026
Sulfate-reducing bacteria in acid mine drainage: ecological constraints, microbial networks, and functional persistence.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are key functional microorganisms in the bioremediation of acid mine drainage (AMD), simultaneously removing sulfate, generating alkalinity, and precipitating metal sulfides via dissimilatory sulfate reduction. AMD is typically characterized by low pH, high sulfate and metal concentrations, and limited organic carbon, imposing persistent stress on SRB growth, metabolism, and function. Environmental stressors include acidic conditions, heavy metal toxicity, low-temperature stress, and electron-donor limitation. These stressors impair membrane stability, enzymatic activity, and cellular energy conservation. Their combined effects increase maintenance requirements while limiting energy acquisition, ultimately reducing the range of environmental conditions under which SRB can sustain sulfate reduction. At the community level, SRB function is further modulated by complex microbial networks. Various functional groups, including fermenters, methanogens, and sulfur- and iron-cycling microorganisms, interact with SRB through cooperative, competitive, and regulatory processes that influence electron transfer, carbon turnover, and iron-sulfur transformations. Sulfate reduction in AMD depends on these community-level interactions, which can be disrupted under environmental stress and may reduce the stability of sulfate-reducing communities. Engineering strategies such as slow-release carbon supplementation, pH microenvironment optimization, conductive material amendment, mineral-microbe interface regulation, and immobilized reactor design can enhance SRB persistence by stabilizing the extracellular microenvironment, regulating electron flow, and spatially decoupling metabolic and mineralization interfaces. This review highlights how environmental stressors and microbial networks jointly regulate SRB function, emphasizes the roles of metabolic niche constraints and community resilience, and provides mechanistic insights for improving the stability and practical performance of SRB-based AMD treatment systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.