ArticleJournal of Maine Medical Center2020
Northern New England Clinical and Translational Research Network Assesses the Training Needs of Investigators.
Article in Journal of Maine Medical Center, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Storytelling to Communicate COVID-19 Research Efforts.Journal of Maine Medical Center · 2025Article
- Researcher Views of Barriers to Clinical and Translational Research in a Statewide Program.Evaluation & the health professions · 2023Article
- Participatory needs assessment and action planning for a clinical and translational research network.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: The Northern New England Clinical and Translational Research (NNE-CTR) Network aims to enhance the region's research capacity and infrastructure with support in research design and technology, professional development and mentorship, and funding for pilot projects. This study sought to identify characteristics of NNE-CTR investigators and their research interests, training needs, and perceived barriers to research. Methods: A registration survey and needs-assessment module were developed and administered to investigators in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont. Univariate statistics were calculated for all structured items. Bivariate frequencies were generated to assess the relationship between training interests and level of research experience. Content analysis was used to identify common themes. Results: Of 272 investigators, many were women (60%), white (85%), and physicians (54%). Most respondents reported participating in a research project (88%) and an interest in translational science research (51%). Fewer than half reported receiving extramural funding. Many respondents expressed interest in receiving mentoring and/or training related to study design. Participants with fewer than 3 years of research experience were more likely to report barriers related to lack of time to conduct research, while participants with ≥3 years of experience more often reported inadequate institutional support and challenges in recruiting and identifying patients. Discussion: Echoing findings from other needs assessment efforts, this study underscores the need to build core research skills through professional development and to tailor training opportunities to investigator's needs. Conclusions: Ongoing efforts to match the identified needs and interests with the appropriate resources remains a key feature of the NNE-CTR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.