Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42643853›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2026

Inferring feedback regulation from static snapshots of a single signal.

Miriam Ginzberg, Ceryl Tan, Nish Patel, Ran Kafri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Miriam GinzbergThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ceryl TanThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nish PatelThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ran KafriThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct measurement of feedback regulation remains difficult because it usually relies on pathway perturbations and prior knowledge of circuit topology. We introduce AoF (Assay of Feedback), a single-cell imaging framework that combines fixed-cell measurements of a target (together with DNA and Geminin as cell-cycle ordering markers) with ergodic rate analysis to reconstruct target dynamics in steady-state proliferating populations and quantify how a target's inferred rate of change depends on its own level. AoF therefore estimates feedback sign, magnitude, and state dependence from snapshot data without resolving surrounding circuitry. As a proof of concept, we applied AoF to map Akt phosphorylation across the cell cycle, unmasking a highly localized negative feedback loop restricted to the G1/S transition. Biochemical experiments point to an mTORC1/S6K1-dependent inhibitory phosphorylation of IRS1, which would stabilize Akt activation during early S phase, as the likeliest source of this snapshot-derived signature, but they do not establish that edge uniquely. AoF provides a rapid, scalable, and perturbation-free methodology to map context-specific feedback control.

Indexed as

AktCell cycleErgodic rate analysismTORC1RapamycinSingle-cell imaging

Identifiers

PMID42643853
PMCPMC13505498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.