ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026
Population pharmacokinetics, target attainment and individualized dosing of isavuconazole in critically ill adults receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for acute respiratory distress syndrome are at high risk of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, but isavuconazole population pharmacokinetics and target attainment during ECMO remain incompletely characterized. To characterize isavuconazole population pharmacokinetics during ECMO, quantify between-patient variability and the probability of target attainment (PTA) and derive dosing implications. Patients and methods: Fifteen critically ill adults receiving ECMO and intravenous isavuconazole were studied prospectively, with 148 plasma concentrations measured over 168 h. First loading doses of 200, 300 or 400 mg reflected a stepwise change in institutional practice and were followed in all patients by 200 mg q8h × 5 and 200 mg q24h. Individual parameters were estimated by Bayesian forecasting against a literature-informed prior, and PTA was evaluated by simulating 5000 virtual subjects under five maintenance regimens. Results: Loading-phase exposure increased with the first dose (median AUC Conclusions: ECMO did not alter isavuconazole population clearance, so routine dose escalation is not warranted. Wide between-patient variability precludes any fixed regimen and favours therapeutic drug monitoring-guided individualized dosing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.