ArticleMDM policy & practice
Guidelines and Policies as Levers in Managing Carpal Tunnel Release Demand.
Article in MDM policy & practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: National guidelines and health policy measures can influence both demand for and delivery of elective surgery as well as the setting in which procedures are performed. Carpal tunnel release (CTR), one of the most common elective operations, provides a useful case for examining these effects. This study addresses 2 key research objectives: 1) the evaluation of the impact of Finland's 2007 guideline requiring preoperative electromyoneurography on CTR incidence trends and 2) the assessment of trends in the adoption of procedural room (PR) surgery in university hospitals. Methods: We used Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register (NHDR) data to identify all CTR procedures between 1997 and 2021. The years 2020 to 2021 were excluded due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Negative binomial regression models with population offset were used to estimate annual changes in incidence, adjusted for age and sex. Age- and sex-standardized incidence rates were calculated using direct standardization. Pre- and postguideline period analyses were performed. University hospital records (2017-2025) were analyzed to determine the rates of PR-based CTR. Results: Between 1997 and 2019, 181,552 CTR procedures were performed in Finland. The age- and sex-standardized incidence increased from 91.9 to 233 per 100,000 person-years. From 1997 to 2007, the incidence of CTR increased by 7.5% annually ( Conclusion: The 2007 national guideline was associated with a marked reduction in CTR incidence growth. The move to PR-based CTR in university hospitals illustrates a high-impact policy strategy for reducing costs, reallocating operating theater capacity, and promoting more sustainable surgical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.