ArticleDigital health
Integrating wearable biosensing with clinical interviews for suicide risk detection in adolescents.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adolescent suicide is a critical public health challenge. Traditional risk screening relies on self-report measures limited by various biases, while passive EDA monitoring during daily activities, often yields limited predictive validity due to environmental confounding such as motion artifacts, thermoregulatory sweating, and ambient temperature fluctuations. This study proposes an innovative "interview-embedded" framework to capture physiological signatures of suicide ideation (SI) during a standardized clinical probe. Methods: A total of 151 adolescents (102 with active suicide ideation, 49 matched controls) were enrolled. Their electrodermal activity signals were continuously recorded throughout clinical interview (Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents) and analyzed through advanced machine learning approaches. Results: XGBoost model achieved superior classification performance (AUC=0.802, sensitivity=0.857, specificity=0.8) compared to CatBoost, and Balanced Random Forest, significantly outperforming resting-state models and clinical symptom baselines (Resting EDA Model: AUC = 0.598, sensitivity = 0.571, specificity = 0.4; Full Clinical Interview Baseline: AUC = 0.926, sensitivity = 0.476, specificity = 1; Symptom-only Clinical Baseline Model: AUC = 0.712, sensitivity = 0.619, specificity = 0.8). Feature importance analysis revealed that dynamic features reflecting physiological reactivity were the most discriminative markers, providing predictive information potentially beyond self-report. EDA features did not significantly correlate with continuous BSS severity scores (all ρ < 0.15, all p > 0.05; regression R Conclusions: This study demonstrates that a task-embedded biosensing framework, integrating wearable biosensing into standardized clinical interviews is a feasible and effective approach for adolescent suicide risk detection. Embedding physiological data collection within established clinical workflows offers a scalable solution to improve early suicide risk screening in real-world settings, such as schools and primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.