ReviewIntractable & rare diseases research2026
Japanese intractable and rare dermatologic diseases: From the official skin-centered nanbyo core to an illustrative mechanism-based framework.
Review in Intractable & rare diseases research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Japan's designated intractable disease (nanbyo) framework combines a population threshold with unresolved pathogenesis or treatment, long-term care needs, objective diagnostic criteria, and severity-linked assistance with medical expenses. We conducted a targeted narrative review of official Japanese sources and biomedical literature through August 3, 2026. Evidence ranged from regulatory approvals and randomized trials to observational, case-report, and preclinical data, so therapeutic maturity was assessed separately from mechanistic plausibility. We distinguished the 12 official skin/connective-tissue entries from six purposively selected designated entries or disease groups with decisive cutaneous phenotypes or Japan-specific translational value. The resulting 18-entry framework is illustrative, not exhaustive. It highlights Japan-specific biology or evidence regarding xeroderma pigmentosum, acquired idiopathic generalized anhidrosis, DPP-4 inhibitor-related bullous pemphigoid, generalized pustular psoriasis, cold-medicine-related SJS/TEN, anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis, and Nakajo-Nishimura syndrome. Recently approved indications or uses include dupilumab for adult bullous pemphigoid, IL-36 receptor blockade, topical COL7A1 gene delivery, autologous gene-corrected epidermal sheets, MEK inhibition, IL-1 blockade, and topical mTOR inhibition; JAK-interferon strategies remain investigational. We contend that Japan's designation infrastructure could become an interoperable translational platform linking natural-history cohorts, endotype-defined enrollment, mechanism-aligned endpoints, and multinational adaptive trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.