ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2026
AI-Assisted Recognition of Actual Ureteral and Pancreatic Injuries in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Video Review Study.
Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted anatomical recognition may help surgeons recognize intraoperative adverse events missed during surgery. We evaluated whether AI-enhanced videos improved recognition of ureteral and pancreatic injuries. Methods: In this two-institution randomized video-review study using historical laparoscopic colorectal surgery videos, 150 surgeons reviewed either EUREKA-generated AI-enhanced videos or unenhanced videos. Five videos were reviewed: three actual injury videos, including unrecognized injuries, and two clinically comparable no-injury control videos. The primary outcome was correct injured-organ recognition. Secondary outcomes included recognition within the predefined injury time-code window and correct no-adverse-event judgment. Results: Seventy-five surgeons were assigned to each group, with no significant baseline differences. AI-enhanced videos improved ureteral injury recognition in Video A (40.0% vs. 22.7%; Conclusion: AI-generated anatomical highlighting improved surgeons' recognition of actual ureteral injuries under controlled video-review conditions without increasing incorrect adverse-event judgments. These findings provide proof-of-concept evidence that AI-generated overlays may support timely recognition of clinically important intraoperative adverse events. Prospective intraoperative studies are needed to determine whether this recognition benefit facilitates earlier management, changes operative decision-making, reduces complications, or improves patient outcomes. Trial Registration: UMIN-CTR; UMIN ID: UMIN000059439.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.