Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42643657›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2026

Alcohol use and support receipt among people experiencing homelessness in England: a cross-sectional analysis with comparison to private household populations.

Vera Helen Buss, Sharon Cox, Melissa Oldham, Harry Tattan-Birch, Sarah E Jackson, Debra Hertzberg, Lion Shahab, Jamie Brown, Dimitra Kale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vera Helen BussDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9963-8693
Sharon CoxDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
Melissa OldhamDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5353-9152
Harry Tattan-BirchDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9410-8343
Sarah E JacksonDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5658-6168
Debra HertzbergHomeless Link, London, UK.
Lion ShahabDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4033-442X
Jamie BrownDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2797-5428
Dimitra KaleDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8845-7114

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Alcohol-related harm is more prevalent among people experiencing homelessness, but national data often overlook this group. This study examined alcohol use and receipt of support and compared this group with the general population. Methods: We analysed data from the Homeless Health Needs Audit (2015-2021; cross-sectional survey of a convenience sample of people experiencing homelessness in England), and for general population estimates, from the nationally representative Health Survey for England (2022). Outcomes included any alcohol use, exceeding drinking guidelines (>14 units per week), possible alcohol use disorder (men: >50 units per week; women: >35 units per week), self-identified alcohol problem and receipt of support for their drinking. We estimated the prevalence for each of the outcomes and odds of receiving support and type of support by age, gender and type of homelessness. Results: Among people experiencing homelessness (n=2652), 78.4% (95% CI 76.5% to 80.2%) consumed alcohol, 31.1% (95% CI 29.3% to 33.3%) exceeded drinking guidelines and 19.2% (95% CI 17.4% to 20.9%) had possible alcohol use disorder, compared with 83.4% (95% CI 82.4% to 84.4%), 23.9% (95% CI 22.7% to 25.1%) and 4.8% (95% CI 4.2% to 5.5%) in the general population, respectively. For the latter two outcomes, prevalence was highest among people sleeping rough (47.4% (95% CI 40.8% to 54.1) and 37.8% (95% CI 31.4% to 44.2%), respectively). Overall, 28.3% (95% CI 26.5% to 30.0%) self-identified ever having an alcohol problem; of these, 58.4% (95% CI 54.7% to 62.1%) received support. People sleeping rough had lower odds of receiving support than those in their own tenancy at risk of homelessness (OR adjusted for age and gender: 0.26 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.54)). Conclusions: Similar proportions of people experiencing homelessness and those in private households reported drinking alcohol in the past year. However, people experiencing homelessness were more likely to exceed drinking guidelines and had approximately fourfold higher prevalence of alcohol use disorder. Although nearly two in three individuals self-identifying as having had an alcohol problem received support, access was unequal, with substantially lower odds of support among people sleeping rough.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesIll-Housed PersonsPrevalencePublic Health

Identifiers

PMID42643657
PMCPMC13504531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.