ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Closed-loop EEG-based neurofeedback and brain-computer interface interventions for mental health: a review.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalogram (EEG)-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have been widely explored for detecting and monitoring mental health-related states, with many existing studies focusing on identification and classification. Such approaches are primarily observational and provide limited support for intervention. Closed-loop EEG-based BCIs address this limitation by incorporating real-time feedback to observe neural activity. A key paradigm within this context is neurofeedback, in which users learn to modulate their own brain activity, with the aim of supporting improvements in mental states and in psychological functioning. In this work, we conducted a review of closed-loop EEG-based BCI interventions for mental health published since 2021, guided by the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting principles. A structured search was conducted across three databases (Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed), yielding 1,101 records, of which 25 studies met the inclusion criteria. Advancements and observations were summarized across four categories: application, paradigm design and feedback mechanisms, signal processing and machine learning methods, and performance metrics and outcomes. In addition, this review discusses considerations related to signal processing and machine learning (ML), user interface design, and regulatory mechanisms across BCI interventions. Finally, potential directions for future research are outlined, including multimodal BCIs, domain adaptation, the integration of generative AI for BCI-based therapeutic interventions, and home-based deployment. Overall, current findings support the technical feasibility and emerging therapeutic potential of closed-loop EEG-based neurofeedback and BCI interventions in mental health applications, but the evidence base remains preliminary, as many studies were small pilot or feasibility studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.