ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Predicting burnout in radiology nurses: an interpretable machine learning model developed and externally validated in a multi-center study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and externally validate an interpretable machine learning model for predicting individual burnout risk among radiology nurses, and to identify modifiable, non-linear risk thresholds to guide precision prevention. Methods: A two-center, two-stage design was used. A development cohort ( Results: The XGBoost model achieved strong discrimination in external validation (AUC = 0.859). In the internal test set, XGBoost outperformed logistic regression and other machine learning algorithms (AUC: 0.963 vs. 0.910 for logistic regression). SHAP analysis identified Effort-Reward Imbalance and Overcommitment as dominant predictors, and revealed a potential inflection point at approximately 65 weekly work hours, beyond which burnout risk escalated disproportionately in the SHAP analysis. Decision curve analysis confirmed net clinical benefit across threshold probabilities of 5 -65%. Individualized risk profiles were generated for actionable nurse management. Conclusion: This externally validated, interpretable XGBoost-SHAP framework moves beyond population-averaged associations. By uncovering specific non-linear thresholds (e.g., 65 h/week workload) and providing personalized risk profiles, it enables nurse managers to shift from reactive crisis management to data-driven, precision prevention of burnout in radiology nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.