Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42643612›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

A 24-hour landmark machine learning model for predicting new-onset sepsis-associated encephalopathy.

Weiwei Hong, Ziming Jiang, Jiahui Ruan, Danfeng Weng, Ruijuan Zhang, Liang Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Weiwei HongTaizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Ziming JiangTaizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Jiahui RuanOpen College, Taizhou Open University, Taizhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Danfeng WengTaizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Ruijuan ZhangTaizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Liang DongTaizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, Zhejiang Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a common neurological complication of sepsis and is associated with prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay, extended mechanical ventilation, and poor outcomes. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a 24-hour landmark machine learning-based model for predicting new-onset SAE after the first ICU day in patients with sepsis. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 537 ICU patients meeting the Sepsis-3 criteria. This retrospective study developed a 24-hour landmark prediction model. Clinical variables collected during the first 24 h after ICU admission were used to predict new-onset SAE occurring after the 24-hour landmark time point among patients who survived, remained in the ICU, and were SAE-free during the first ICU day. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, vital signs, laboratory parameters, organ function scores, therapeutic interventions, and prognosis-related variables were collected. Missing data were handled by multiple imputation. The cohort was randomly divided into a training set and an internal test set at a 7:3 ratio. Model performance was evaluated using internal validation only. Six models were developed, including logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, and naive Bayes. Model performance was assessed using discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis. Results: SAE occurred in 215 patients, corresponding to an incidence of 40.0%. Compared with non-SAE patients, patients with SAE had greater disease severity, higher SOFA and APACHE II scores, increased respiratory rate, worse renal and inflammatory profiles, and higher rates of vasoactive drug use, mechanical ventilation, and continuous renal replacement therapy. In the internal test set, logistic regression showed the highest AUC among the candidate models, with an AUC of 0.767, accuracy of 0.698, and sensitivity of 0.754. Calibration analysis showed acceptable agreement between predicted and observed risks, and decision curve analysis indicated potential net benefit. A nomogram was constructed to visualize the final model. Conclusion: The logistic regression-based model showed moderate predictive performance and may support preliminary 24-hour landmark risk stratification for new-onset SAE in ICU patients with sepsis. Further multicenter prospective validation is required.

Indexed as

intensive care unitlogistic regressionmachine learningsepsissepsis-associated encephalopathy

Identifiers

PMID42643612
PMCPMC13503553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.