ArticleContemporary school psychology2026
Predicting Risk for Reading Difficulty among Spanish-English Speaking Students: Classification Accuracy of Kindergarten Oral Language and Early Literacy.
Article in Contemporary school psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Assessment and identification of language and reading disabilities among young bilingual children represent a significant challenge. Research indicates that language and reading disabilities are frequently misidentified in this population (e.g., Mancilla-Martinez et al., 2023). Misidentification has serious consequences, as children with significant learning needs may not receive appropriate supports. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify which kindergarten early language and literacy measures have good classification accuracy for predicting first grade reading difficulty among Spanish-English bilingual children. Two hundred twenty children across South Carolina and Texas participated in this study. Children were enrolled in kindergarten, when they completed measures of oral language and early literacy skills in Spanish and English, and followed through first grade, when they completed measures of Spanish and English reading skills. Approximately 60% of the sample was enrolled in dual language instructional programs, and the remainder of the sample was enrolled in English-only programs. Results indicated that kindergarten English rapid letter naming had strong classification accuracy for distinguishing risk for dyslexia at the end of first grade among children enrolled in Spanish-English dual language instruction. However, no measures had strong classification accuracy for distinguishing children at risk for reading difficulty in English-only instructional contexts. These results have clear practical implications for screening bilingual students for risk for dyslexia and highlight the importance of considering language of instruction when evaluating risk for reading difficulty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.