ArticlePolitische Vierteljahresschrift2026
Challenging Growing Regional Inequality: Area-Based Policies in Germany as a Path to Equivalent Living Standards?
Article in Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, inequality has deepened across many European countries. Targeted investments have seen limited success, and many democracies face growing polarization as disparities along economic, demographic, and social lines persist. In Germany, residents of structurally disadvantaged areas increasingly feel overlooked by policies focused on economic growth rather than everyday needs. This article explores what residents in these regions perceive as lacking in their living environments, what influences their satisfaction or dissatisfaction, and how well current policy, specifically the funding scheme of the Joint Task for the Improvement of Regional Economic Structures (GRW), responds to these concerns. Based on fieldwork in three GRW-eligible communities, the study compares local perceptions with the scheme's design and recent reforms. While reforms show a shift toward basic infrastructure, important aspects of daily life, such as transport, social spaces, and local retail, remain difficult to support under current funding rules. Civil society actors face limited access to resources, and municipalities often lack the capacity to apply for and implement available funds. These findings point to the need for better alignment between funding mechanisms and the lived realities in disadvantaged regions. Supplementary Information: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11615-025-00636-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.