ArticlePalliative care and social practice2026
Decision-making and peri-operative perspectives of patients with advanced cancer who have decided for and proceeded with palliative gastrointestinal surgery: A qualitative study.
Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Palliative gastrointestinal surgery improves symptoms and health-related quality of life among patients with advanced cancer who present with bowel obstruction. However, there remains limited understanding on decision-making surrounding palliative surgery, particularly risks and implications for patients near end-of-life. Objectives: This study aims to explore the perspectives of patients who have decided and proceeded with Palliative Gastrointestinal Surgery across the perioperative period, including considerations that shaped decision-making for palliative gastrointestinal surgery, challenges in decision-making, and subsequent post-surgery experiences in patients with advanced cancer. Methods: We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with 25 purposively sampled patients with advanced stage IV cancer, who had underwent palliative gastrointestinal surgery for malignant bowel obstruction. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. Results: There were four key considerations that shaped patients' decision for palliative gastrointestinal surgery. They included the hopes for return to normalcy and symptomatic relief, trust in surgeons and communication, religious beliefs, and familial pressures and support. Misunderstandings about treatment options and achievable outcomes after surgery, and the need to navigate fears and anxiety due to the uncertainties surrounding surgery were the main challenges encountered during decision-making. Post-surgery, while most were satisfied with their decision to undergo surgery, some faced decisional regret due to new or heightened care needs associated with ongoing cancer progression. Conclusion: Decision-making for palliative gastrointestinal surgery is complex, with patients weighing a range of considerations. Challenges include misunderstandings on options and outcomes and navigating uncertainties. These challenges highlight opportunities to improve patient care through improved communication and the provision of emotional support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.