ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2026
An automated deep learning-based pipeline for 3D characterisation of the murine upper airway from micro-CT.
Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Upper airway structure and function are affected in several respiratory (e.g., obstructive sleep apnoea, allergic rhinitis, and asthma) and congenital [e.g., Down syndrome (DS)] conditions. Although murine models are widely used to study airway pathology and to evaluate therapies, quantitative analysis of the upper airway on micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) remains limited as it is hampered by labour-intensive and observer-dependent manual segmentation of the images. Automated and standardized image analysis methods are therefore needed to support mechanistic and translational upper airway research. Materials and methods: We developed a deep learning-based pipeline for fully automated segmentation and characterization of the trachea, pharynx, and nasal cavity from micro-CT images. A full-resolution 2D CNN based on the nnU-Net framework was trained in the axial plane using 5-fold cross-validation on 106 scans from a DS study involving wild-type (WT) and trisomic (TS) mice. Generalisability was assessed on an external validation set of 74 scans from another DS study examining the effect of RSV infection in WT and TS mice. Model performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), relative absolute volume difference (RAVD), Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis between manual and automated measurements. Results: Strong segmentation performance was obtained on the internal validation set, with DSC of 0.988 ± 0.010, 0.985 ± 0.008, and 0.958 ± 0.004, and RAVD of 1.483% ± 1.800%, 1.506% ± 1.217% and 1.965% ± 1.563% for trachea, pharynx and nasal cavity, respectively. Performance remained robust on the external validation set, confirming generalisability across different experimental conditions and imaging protocols. Automatically extracted volumetric biomarkers showed strong agreement with manual measurements and small Bland-Altman biases. The pipeline reproduced biologically relevant group differences previously identified through manual analysis, including reduced pharynx and nasal cavity volumes in TS mice compared with WT controls. Conclusions: We present a deep learning-based pipeline for automated, standardized 3D characterization of the murine upper airway from micro-CT. By reducing manual workload and enhancing measurement consistency, it enables high-throughput phenotyping and mechanistic investigation of the upper airway in preclinical models. By facilitating direct, automated measurements from imaging, our pipeline strengthens the translational bridge between experimental and clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.