Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42643468›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026

The Eurostack of digital health cybersecurity.

Celia Brightwell, Chiara Carboni, Orit Halpern

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Celia BrightwellChair of Digital Cultures, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Chiara CarboniChair of Digital Cultures, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Orit HalpernChair of Digital Cultures, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cybersecurity infrastructures are designed to mitigate the risks posed by two common entities: the layperson who circumvents cybersecurity guidelines, and the malicious actor who exploits weaknesses in security mechanisms. In this perspective, we show that a third entity, the US state-platform, is re-shaping cybersecurity infrastructures for digital health in Europe. The state-platform describes the centralization of power signified by the close relationship between the second Trump administration and the rise of the tech oligarchy. Drawing on interviews with experts working on cybersecurity for digital health in Europe, we show how concerns about the state-platform are driving digital sovereignty interventions consistent with the Eurostack initiative.

Indexed as

Big Techcybersecuritydigital healthdigital sovereigntyEurostackstate-platform

Identifiers

PMID42643468
PMCPMC13503370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.