Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42643442›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in nursing : JRN2026

Psychometric assessment of the Competence in Research Utilisation instrument in a sample of graduating nursing students in three European countries.

Asta Heikkilä, Minna Stolt, Maija Hupli, Jouko Katajisto, Boris Miha Kaučič, Katarzyna Kwiecień-Jaguś, Helena Leino-Kilpi, Leena Salminen, Riitta Suhonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in nursing : JRN, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Asta HeikkiläClinical Lecturer, Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1151-7382
Minna StoltProfessor, Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Maija HupliDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Jouko KatajistoLecturer, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Boris Miha KaučičAssociate Professor, Institute for Training, Work and Care Dr. Marjan Borštnar Dornava, Dornava, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9708-3214
Katarzyna Kwiecień-JaguśAssistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology Nursing & Intensive Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Helena Leino-KilpiProfessor (emerita), Researcher, Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Leena SalminenProfessor (emerita), Researcher, Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Riitta SuhonenProfessor, Director of Nursing, Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based practice is an internationally accepted healthcare standard grounded in research utilisation. Validated instruments allow evaluation of nursing education against European Union competence requirements. Aim: To assess the psychometric properties of the Competence in Research Utilisation (CompRU) instrument among graduating nursing students using data from three European countries. Methods: Data were collected from graduating nursing students ( Results: Internal consistency reliability was acceptable in all sections, despite two categories in the Knowledge section showing lower consistency. Rasch analysis supported the internal scale validity of the Knowledge section in terms of item infit and item separation. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the structure (Skills and Attitudes sections) and strength of the hypothetical model. Conclusion: The CompRU instrument is a promising tool for measuring nursing students' research utilisation competence at graduation. Based on both classical and modern test theory approaches, the instrument demonstrates evidence of acceptable psychometric properties, although some items in the Knowledge section could benefit from future revisions.

Indexed as

assessmentevidence-based practiceinstrumentnursing educationpsychometric testingresearch utilisation

Identifiers

PMID42643442
PMCPMC13503634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.